Is Next.js better than Remix.run? | Next.js vs Remix in 2024 - YouTube
In this video I will be looking at Remix.run and Next.js, comparing the features, advantages, and drawbacks of both frameworks. By the end of this video, I w...
Click
Use
to move to a smaller summary and to move to a larger one
Comparison of Learning Ease and Development Experience Between Next.js and Remix
- Learning Next.js is easier compared to learning Remix due to the availability of more resources such as blog articles, videos, workshops, and documentation.
- Next.js has a larger community and more content on platforms like YouTube, making it easier to find learning materials.
- Remix, on the other hand, has fewer resources available, including blog articles and videos, making it harder to learn for beginners.
- Next.js has more courses focused on teaching the framework compared to Remix.
- The development experience with Next.js has improved with the release of Next.js 4.0, providing better error messages and documentation.
- The development experience with Remix is generally smoother, with a faster HMR (Hot Module Replacement) and a more efficient death server compared to Next.js.
- Remix uses V (Vite) for its development server, which is faster and more efficient compared to Next.js's death server.
- The performance of Remix in terms of HMR and refresh speed is superior to Next.js based on a comparison of identical projects.
- Next.js is working on improving the death server with Turbo, but it still has room for improvement.
Comparison between NEX Share and Remix for framework selection
- NEX Share has a larger ecosystem due to its existence for many years.
- Deployment with NEX Share is challenging when using different serverless providers.
- Remix is easier to deploy to different providers without any configuration issues.
- The structure of the framework is different between NEX Share and Remix, with NEX Share using a folder-based approach and Remix using flat routes.
- There is no clear winner in terms of usability as both frameworks have their own workflows and characteristics.
- Personal preference plays a role in selecting the framework for a project.
Pros and Cons of Next.js and Remix Frameworks
- Next.js is suitable for creating standard content-driven websites with basic layouts and caching.
- Remix is preferable for creating dynamic applications with a fast dev server.
- Next.js relies on the ecosystem for authentication and caching, while Remix has minimal caching and faster dev server.
- Caching can be complicated with Next.js for highly dynamic websites, while Remix handles it better.
- Hours (Webpack issues) can still occur with both frameworks, but have improved over time.
- Both frameworks can create good websites and yield the same end result.
- Next.js is easier for content-driven websites, while Remix excels in highly dynamic applications.
- Ultimately, the choice depends on the specific project requirements and personal preference.
Comparison of Learning Next.js and Remix Frameworks
- Next.js has more resources such as blog articles, videos, workshops, and documentation compared to Remix.
- Next.js has a larger community and more content on platforms like YouTube, making it easier to find learning materials.
- Next.js has more courses focused on teaching the framework compared to Remix.
- The development experience with Next.js has improved with the release of Next.js 4.0, providing better error messages and documentation.
- Remix has fewer resources available, including blog articles and videos, making it harder to learn for beginners.
- The development experience with Remix is generally smoother, with a faster HMR and a more efficient dev server compared to Next.js.
- Remix uses Vite for its development server, which is faster and more efficient compared to Next.js's dev server.